Monday , May 23 2022
Diversity in India

Democracy and Diversity: 10 Political Science

Question: How social differences overlaps with other difference? Explain with examples.

Answer:

  1. It takes place when some social divisions or social differences overlap. The difference between black & white become a social division in USA because tend to be poor, homeless and discriminated.
  2. In our country, dalits tend to be poor and landless, they often face discrimination and injustice.
  3. These kind of situations produce social divisions when one kind of social difference becomes more important than the other and the people start feeling that they belong to different communities.

Question: Explain the reasons of social differences.
Or
Why do social differences emerge in society?

Answer:

  1. Birth: Birth is the most important factor which is responsible for social differences. A person in India is considered of a low caste because of his birth in the lower class family. A Black is discriminated from White because of his colour which is once again controlled by birth.
  2. Differences based on choice: Some of the differences are based on our choices. For example, some people are atheists. They don’t believe in God or any religion. Differences also occur because of choice of occupation. Differences occur among the people because of different professions and economic activities also.
  3. Differences based on religion: Sometimes religion can be one of the causes of social differences. It is fairly common for people belonging to the same religion to feel that they do not belong to the same community because their caste or sect is very different.
  4. Differences based on economic status: Economic status can also be responsible for social differences. Rich and poor people belonging to the same community or religion or sect often do not keep close relations with each other as they feel that they are very different.
  5. Differences based on caste / color: In many regions of the world people are differentiated on the basis of caste or colour. For example, in United States and South Africa Blacks were discriminated because of their skin color.

Question: Explain the overlapping and cross-cutting differences.
Or
Explain the cross-cutting differences with suitable examples.

Answer: Overlapping differences:

  1. These social divisions take place when some social differences overlap with many other differences.
  2. The difference between the Blacks and Whites becomes a social division in the United States because historically, most of the Blacks are poor, homeless and discriminated against.
  3. In India, the Dalits tend to be poor and landless. They often face discrimination and injustice.
  4. These kinds of situations produce social divisions which are harmful for democracy, and weaken the basic foundation of democracy.
  5. When one kind of social difference becomes more important than any other, and people start feeling that, they belong to different communities then this can lead to the disintegration of the country.

Cross-cutting differences:

  1. Under cross-cutting differences, people share common interests on one issue but are likely to be on different side on another issue.
  2. Cross-cutting social differences are easier to accommodate.
  3. Netherlands and Northern Ireland are Christian countries divided into Catholics and Protestants.
  4. In Netherlands, class and religion tend to cut across each other. This means Catholics and the Protestants are about equally likely to be poor or rich.
  5. In Northern Ireland, class and religion overlap with each other, i.e., if one is Catholic, he is also more likely to be poor.

Question: “The combination of politics and social divisions is very dangerous and explosive. It can make social divisions into political divisions and lead to conflict, violence or even disintegration of a country.” Justify.
Or
Explain with special reference to Northern Ireland the ways in which social divisions have resulted in violent and bitter ethno-political conflict.

Answer:

  1. Let us take the case of Northern Ireland that we referred to above. This region of the United Kingdom has been for many years the site of a violent and bitter ethno-political conflict. Its population is divided into two major sects of Christianity: 53 per cent are Protestants, while 44 per cent are Roman Catholics.
  2. The Catholics were represented by Nationalist parties who demanded that Northern Ireland be unified with the Republic of Ireland, a predominantly Catholic country whereas the Protestants were represented by Unionists who wanted to remain with the UK, which is predominantly protestant.
  3. Hundreds of civilians, militants and security forces were killed in the fight between Unionists and Nationalists and between the security forces of the UK and the Nationalists.
  4. It was only in 1998, that the UK government and the Nationalists reached a peace treaty after which the latter suspended their armed struggle.
  5. Political competition along religious ending ethnic lines led to the disintegration of Yugoslavia into six independent countries.

Question: ‘Three factors are crucial in deciding the outcome of politics of social divisions’. Explain.

Answer:

  1. People’s perception: This is the most important factor which decides the outcome of politics of social divisions. If people see their identities in singular and exclusive terms, it will lead to social divisions and violence. As long as, people in Ireland saw themselves as only Catholic or Protestant, their difference prevailed.
    It is much easier if the people see that their identities are multiple and are complementary with the national identity. A majority of Belgians now feel that they are as much Belgian nationalist or citizens as they are Dutch or German speaking. This feeling binds them together. Though—India is a multi-cultural country, but the feeling of nationalism binds us together.
  2. Raising of demands by political leaders: The outcome of politics of social division also depends on how political leaders raise the demands of any community. It is easier to accommodate demands that are within the constitutional framework and are not at the cost of another community.The Sinhalese leaders of Sri Lanka wanted to fulfill their demand at the cost of other communities, and this led to the civil war. In Yugoslavia, the leaders of different ethnic communities presented their demands in such a way that these could not be accommodated within a single country.
  3. Reaction of Government: The outcome also depends on how the government reacts to the demands of different groups. If the rulers are willing to share power and accommodate the reasonable demands of minority community, social divisions become less threatening for the country. But if they try to suppress such a demand with force and in the name of national unity, this can lead to civil war or division of country, and that is what happened in Sri Lanka.

Check Also

10th Science NCERT

Human Eye and Colorful World MCQs: 10th Science Ch 11

Human Eye and Colorful World MCQs: CBSE Class 10 Science Chapter 11 Human Eye and …